Impact on Rental Prices in Bristol with the Renters' Right Act
The ban on bidding wars removes a mechanism that has historically enabled landlords to encourage and accept higher offers above the advertised rent, especially in high-demand areas. In Bristol's fastest-moving districts, Redcliffe (18 days) and Montpelier (19 days), above-asking competition has been a structural feature of the market: tenants could secure a property by outbidding other applicants, compressing lettings times but pushing actual rents above the listed prices.
Under the new framework, the advertised rent becomes a ceiling rather than a starting point. In our opinion, this will result in two opposing effects. We expect the actual rental property prices to increase, since landlords won’t have the opportunity anymore to list below market value in order to generate competitive interest and a bidding war. Instead, as a likely unintended consequence of the Act, properties may be advertised at higher initial price levels to capture what was previously achieved through bidding. Scotland provides a direct precedent: following the introduction of its 2022 rent cap, advertised rents rose at the fastest rate of any UK nation, the opposite of the intended effect (ONS, April 2024). On the other hand, with no mechanism to exceed the advertised rent, tenants’ actual cost of renting will stabilise or even decrease.
Concluding: we expect the advertised rents to increase (especially in competitive areas), while effective rents paid by tenants may remain flat or decline further.
Impact on Days on Market in Bristol with the Renters' Right Act
With bidding wars removed, tenant competition shifts from financial offers to speed and quality of application. The impact on letting times however will not be uniform across Bristol.
In premium, fast-moving districts such as Redcliffe and Montpelier, demand is structurally strong. Properties there let within less than 20 days under the current framework, and this pace is unlikely to slow down: tenants in these areas are motivated and tend to be well-prepared, and competition will simply express itself through faster applications rather than higher bids.
In the mid-market (particularly the flat segment and districts such as the City Centre and Kingsdown) letting times are more likely to extend. The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) already reported a significant increase in landlords with tighter tenant referencing criteria in advance of the Act. Without the shortcut of selecting the highest bidder, landlords are likely to take more time and apply stricter standards to tenant selection.
Impact on Supply in Bristol with the Renters' Right Act
Of these three indicators, supply is where the evidence is strongest and most consistent: rental supply is expected to decline.
The pattern is well-documented internationally. In the Netherlands, the Dutch Affordable Rent Act, effective July 2024, led to a 20% decline in new rental properties within one quarter and a 70% increase in landlord property sales in Q1 2025 (Pararius, Q4 2025 Huurmonitor). In Scotland, landlord- driven property sales rose with nearly 60% as well following the 2022 rent cap.
In England, the trajectory points in the same direction. The English Private Landlord Survey, published by the Ministry of Housing in December 2025, shows that 31% of landlords are planning to reduce their portfolio (up from 22% four years ago), while 16% intend to sell all their properties within two years.
The abolition of Section 21 introduces a secondary supply effect. Tenants who can no longer be evicted without specified grounds are likely to remain in their properties for longer, reducing turnover and the frequency in which homes re-enter the market.
Bristol’s Q1 2026 supply of 7,557 rental properties provides the pre-reform baseline. Based on the weight of international evidence and stated landlord intentions, this figure may prove to be a high-water mark. Rentaroof will track supply, pricing and absorption quality on a quarterly basis to assess the Act’s measurable impact against this baseline.